• 牛大春的见面礼
  • ——有品位.更传情
电话
  • 全国客服专线
  • 029-89393555
热销产品
yabo亚搏-佩雷拉:逆转取胜非常重要 满意上港球员拼搏团结
yabo亚搏-佩雷拉:逆转取胜非常重要 满意上港球员拼搏团结
【yabo亚搏官方网站】虽然竞技体育追求的是成绩,但在特殊的疫情影响下,...
【yabo亚搏官方网站】虽然竞技体育追求的是成绩,但在特殊的疫情影响下,...
【yabo亚搏】6载红蓝时光,已成往事回忆,苏亚雷斯离开巴萨,转...
【yabo亚搏】6载红蓝时光,已成往事回忆,苏亚雷斯离开巴萨,转...
yabo亚搏官方网站|中超第一阶段目前已经进入最后的冲刺阶段,所以在这...
yabo亚搏官方网站|中超第一阶段目前已经进入最后的冲刺阶段,所以在这...
yabo亚搏官方网站|休斯顿公开赛允许有限球迷到场 门票已售出2000张
yabo亚搏官方网站|休斯顿公开赛允许有限球迷到场 门票已售出2000张
yabo亚搏_法国官方:费基尔左腿腿筋受伤,奥亚尔被征召入替
yabo亚搏_法国官方:费基尔左腿腿筋受伤,奥亚尔被征召入替
联系我们
西安市巨鹰食品有限公司
地址:西安市高新一路二号
      国家开发银行大厦809室
电话:029-89393555
当前位置:首页 > 产品中心 > 地方糕点
【yabo亚搏官方网站】什么是足球场上的公平和公正和国安的第二回合的淘汰...
What is fairness and justice on the football field One night has passed since the second round of the knockout match with Guoan. The process and results of the game linger in a dream, and it is still a long time to let it go. Vaguely thought of the issue of fairness and justice, that is, what is fairness and justice on the court? Refereeing is a very sacred profession. Holding the power to impose penalties in the game, players must respect him and clubs must respect him. But at the same time, there are also some great responsibilities, that is to let the game go on normally, so that the players on both sides can focus on the game. Let the loser admit that their skills are inferior to others and convince the loser. The winning side will not feel that the game was won by the referee's judgment. Such a referee who is invisible on the court is a good referee. And what did we see in the game last night? Both sides played very well in the first half and the game was also very exciting. On the Luneng side, Moises scored, and on the Guoan side, Bakambu assisted Zhang Yuning to equalize the score. The referee can be said to have completed the penalty for the first half of the game in stealth. But when the time came to 65 minutes, Luneng scored Liu Yu's breakthrough assists from Guedes, Luneng took the lead again, and Guoan's midfield kick-off match continued. But just as it continued, the VAR video referee told the referee through a headset that there might be a foul before the goal, and the referee personally saw the replay and determined that the goal was invalid. It directly led to huge dissatisfaction with Luneng, and the player's psychology has also undergone tremendous changes. In the next minute, Guoan again took the lead by Zhang Yuning's goal. After that, the game will be played in a completely different state of mind until the end of the game. Is there a foul on this ball? First of all, football is a sport with physical contact. When Gerdes breaks through the opposing player, the opposing player falls, and the video referee determines that this breakthrough is foul. But if you follow this standard, the football match can really be cancelled, because the match will be in physical contact at all times, and the match will be played in the middle of every moment. Moreover, Geddes also touched the ball first and was broken. The player's physical center of gravity is also unstable. Secondly, Guoan has no objections to this ball, and even the players who have been breached have not expressed different views. According to Xiao Jin's recollection, the referee said that he thought the ball was not foul, and it was the video referee Maning who thought the ball was foul. Third, in Guoan’s subsequent goals, there was a suspected handball stop, but the referee and the video referee did not express any objections. What can you see from it? The referee's penalty in the last game triggered protests from Luneng, and also directly triggered an investigation into the referee's college thesis by Luneng fans. There is a voice saying that this action will hit people's jobs and will be retaliated by the referee circle. No one dares to punish Luneng's game. What I want to say is if law enforcement is fair and just, what can we worry about? But is this game really enforced fairly? Is there any selective blindness? After the game, coach Luneng said that it was too difficult for Luneng to score a goal, and he didn't know what to say. The referee is critical of Luneng's goal, holding a magnifying glass and can't make any physical contact. He even stopped the game that had been going on and changed the result. But when the opponent has a suspected handball, the referee makes no indication. Is this a stark double-standard behavior? Is this taking power to abuse power? Is this revenge under the cloak of rules? It is said that the depth of Chinese football is really not shallow. Have you ever thought about what is the greatest good? The greatest good is the kind that does not harm anyone's interests. For the good of one person, directly or indirectly harming the interests of another person is not good. It's not particularly generous to others. Imagine from this, what exactly is fairness? In the stadium, using the same rules and penalties is truly fair. Instead of using a magnifying glass to judge one team under the so-called rules, and closing your eyes to another team. Under such penalties, although they are all within the scope of the rules, they always feel that it is not so. Chinese football really sucks. If this continues, it can only get worse. The inaction of the regulators, the interests of the executors are united, and the investment of the club is reduced. If this continues, Chinese football can only bear the consequences. I hope Luneng will withdraw. Without the home team, he will not continue to watch. My heart illuminates the moon, but the moon illuminates the ditch.在足球场上什么是公平正义 自从国安淘汰赛第二轮以来,已经过去了一个晚上。
订购热线:029-89393555
产品详情

What is fairness and justice on the football field One night has passed since the second round of the knockout match with Guoan. The process and results of the game linger in a dream, and it is still a long time to let it go. Vaguely thought of the issue of fairness and justice, that is, what is fairness and justice on the court? Refereeing is a very sacred profession. Holding the power to impose penalties in the game, players must respect him and clubs must respect him. But at the same time, there are also some great responsibilities, that is to let the game go on normally, so that the players on both sides can focus on the game. Let the loser admit that their skills are inferior to others and convince the loser. The winning side will not feel that the game was won by the referee's judgment. Such a referee who is invisible on the court is a good referee. And what did we see in the game last night? Both sides played very well in the first half and the game was also very exciting. On the Luneng side, Moises scored, and on the Guoan side, Bakambu assisted Zhang Yuning to equalize the score. The referee can be said to have completed the penalty for the first half of the game in stealth. But when the time came to 65 minutes, Luneng scored Liu Yu's breakthrough assists from Guedes, Luneng took the lead again, and Guoan's midfield kick-off match continued. But just as it continued, the VAR video referee told the referee through a headset that there might be a foul before the goal, and the referee personally saw the replay and determined that the goal was invalid. It directly led to huge dissatisfaction with Luneng, and the player's psychology has also undergone tremendous changes. In the next minute, Guoan again took the lead by Zhang Yuning's goal. After that, the game will be played in a completely different state of mind until the end of the game. Is there a foul on this ball? First of all, football is a sport with physical contact. When Gerdes breaks through the opposing player, the opposing player falls, and the video referee determines that this breakthrough is foul. But if you follow this standard, the football match can really be cancelled, because the match will be in physical contact at all times, and the match will be played in the middle of every moment. Moreover, Geddes also touched the ball first and was broken. The player's physical center of gravity is also unstable. Secondly, Guoan has no objections to this ball, and even the players who have been breached have not expressed different views. According to Xiao Jin's recollection, the referee said that he thought the ball was not foul, and it was the video referee Maning who thought the ball was foul. Third, in Guoan’s subsequent goals, there was a suspected handball stop, but the referee and the video referee did not express any objections. What can you see from it? The referee's penalty in the last game triggered protests from Luneng, and also directly triggered an investigation into the referee's college thesis by Luneng fans. There is a voice saying that this action will hit people's jobs and will be retaliated by the referee circle. No one dares to punish Luneng's game. What I want to say is if law enforcement is fair and just, what can we worry about? But is this game really enforced fairly? Is there any selective blindness? After the game, coach Luneng said that it was too difficult for Luneng to score a goal, and he didn't know what to say. The referee is critical of Luneng's goal, holding a magnifying glass and can't make any physical contact. He even stopped the game that had been going on and changed the result. But when the opponent has a suspected handball, the referee makes no indication. Is this a stark double-standard behavior? Is this taking power to abuse power? Is this revenge under the cloak of rules? It is said that the depth of Chinese football is really not shallow. Have you ever thought about what is the greatest good? The greatest good is the kind that does not harm anyone's interests. For the good of one person, directly or indirectly harming the interests of another person is not good. It's not particularly generous to others. Imagine from this, what exactly is fairness? In the stadium, using the same rules and penalties is truly fair. Instead of using a magnifying glass to judge one team under the so-called rules, and closing your eyes to another team. Under such penalties, although they are all within the scope of the rules, they always feel that it is not so. Chinese football really sucks. If this continues, it can only get worse. The inaction of the regulators, the interests of the executors are united, and the investment of the club is reduced. If this continues, Chinese football can only bear the consequences. I hope Luneng will withdraw. Without the home team, he will not continue to watch. My heart illuminates the moon, but the moon illuminates the ditch.

在足球场上什么是公平正义 自从国安淘汰赛第二轮以来,已经过去了一个晚上。游戏的过程和结果在梦中徘徊yabo亚搏,要让它继续下去还需要很长时间。模糊地考虑了公平正义的问题,即法院的公平正义是什么? 裁判是一项非常神圣的职业。拥有在比赛中施加处罚的权力,玩家必须尊重他,俱乐部必须尊重他。但与此同时,还有一些重大责任,那就是让游戏正常进行,以便双方玩家都可以专注于游戏。让失败者承认他们的技能不如他人,并说服失败者。获胜方不会认为比赛是由裁判的判断获胜的。这样的裁判员在场上不可见,是一个很好的裁判员。 昨晚我们在游戏中看到了什么? 双方在上半场表现都很出色,比赛也非常令人兴奋。 Moises在鲁能方面得分,而在国安方面,Bakambu协助Zhang Yuning扳平比分。可以说裁判员在比赛上半场隐身完成了点球。 但是当时间到达65分钟时,鲁能在吉德斯身上攻入了刘羽的突破助攻,鲁能再次取得领先,国安队的中场开球比赛继续进行。但是就在继续进行时,VAR视频裁判通过头戴式耳机告诉裁判说,在进球之前可能有犯规,裁判亲自观看了录像并确定目标无效。这直接导致了对鲁能的极大不满,球员的心理也发生了巨大的变化。在第二分钟,国安队再次以张裕宁的进球为首。此后,游戏将以完全不同的状态进行,直到游戏结束。 这个球有犯规吗? 首先,足球是一种身体接触的运动。当Gerdes突破对方的球员时,对方的球员摔倒了,视频裁判判定该突破是犯规的。但是,如果您遵循此标准,则足球比赛实际上可以取消,因为该比赛将始终处于身体接触状态,并且比赛将在每一刻的中间进行。此外,吉德斯还首先触球并被打破。玩家的身体重心也不稳定。 其次,国安队对此球没有异议,即使是被突破的球员也没有表达不同的看法。根据小金的回忆,裁判说他认为球没有犯规,视频裁判曼宁认为球是犯规的。 第三,在国安队随后的进球中,有一个怀疑的手球停球,但是裁判和视频裁判没有表示反对。 您能从中看到什么? 裁判在最后一场比赛中的点球yabo亚搏引发了鲁能的抗议,也直接引发了鲁能球迷对裁判大学论文的调查。有声音说,这一举动将打击人们的工作,并将被裁判界予以报复。没有人敢惩罚鲁能的比赛。我想说的是,如果执法公正公正,我们又会担心什么呢? 但是这个游戏真的可以公平执行吗?有选择性盲吗? 比赛结束后,鲁能教练说鲁能进球很难,他也不知道该说些什么。裁判批评鲁能的进球,拿着放大镜,不能进行任何身体接触。他甚至停止了正在进行的游戏并更改了结果。但是,如果对手怀疑有手球,裁判将不做任何指示。 这是一种明显的双重标准行为吗?这是滥用权力吗?这种报复是在规则的掩饰下吗? 据说中国足球的深度确实不浅。 您是否想过最大的好处是什么?最大的好处就是不会损害任何人的利益。为了一个人的利益,直接或间接损害另一个人的利益是不好的。对其他人不是特别慷慨。 试想一下,公平到底是什么? 在体育场内,使用相同的规则和处罚确实很公平。而不是使用放大镜根据所谓的规则来判断一个团队,而是对另一个团队闭上眼睛。在这种惩罚下,尽管它们都在规则的范围之内,但他们始终认为事实并非如此。 中国足球真的很烂。如果这种情况持续下去,只会变得更糟。监管者的无所作为,执行者的利益被团结在一起,俱乐部的投资减少了。如果这种情况持续下去,中国足球只能承担后果。 希望鲁能退出。没有主队,他将不会继续观看比赛。 yabo亚搏官方网站我的心照亮了月亮,但月亮照亮了沟渠。

 

百度一下,你就知道! 搜狗搜索,网页搜索,微信搜索,视频搜索,图片搜索,音乐搜索,新闻搜索,软件搜索,问答搜索,百科搜索,购物搜索 神马 360搜索,SO靠谱